This is an apropos time to consider The Shroud of Turin. The image on – or in – it shows the barb gouges of a whipping scourging, plus showing that the legs of the victim were not broken – as Jesus’ were not.

Further, the image shows irrefutable signs that the victim had been crowned with a crown of thorns, as Jesus had been.

Further still, the image shows irrefutable signs of the victim having been crucified in the standard manner.

Those parts of the image – the proof of barbed whipping scourging; the proof of the victim being crucified; the unbroken legs, which was most unusual in a crucifixion; and the crown of thorns worn by the victim – all point to Jesus as being the wearer of that controversial shroud.

The crown of thorns is the most powerful indicator of Jesus being the wearer. Who else but Jesus would have been so crowned as a part of his scourging, scourging itself being almost never employed? And crowned for whatever reason, in Jesus’ case for derision as “King of the Jews”?

There is a last subject to consider: how the image was made on the Shroud of Turin. This is a point of great controversy among scientists.

How it was accomplished is known only to those of us who have found how Nature makes gravity.

45

46

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109